The Montgomery Burns Award For Outstanding Achievement In The Field Of Stupid
It appears that CNN has yet to realize that this is now a world where everybody can check your homework, sometimes even before you finish your report to the class. So when you’re cherry-picking the best YouTube questions to try to nail the Republicans, you might want to bone up on your Google-fu.
The retired general who asked about gays and lesbians serving in the military at the CNN/YouTube Republican debate on Wednesday is a co-chairman of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s National Military Veterans group.
David Bohrman, a CNN senior vice president and executive producer of the debate, later said: “We regret this and apologize to the Republican candidates. We never would have used the general’s question had we known that he was connected to any presidential candidate.”
Kerr told CNN that he had not done work for the Clinton campaign, and CNN verified before the debate that he had not contributed money to any candidate, the broadcaster said in a blog post after the debate.
Kerr told CNN he is a member of the Log Cabin Republicans and was representing no one other than himself, CNN said.
Kerr also was on Kerry’s National Veterans Steering Committee, according to a campaign press release retrieved from the website of George Washington University.
Wow. If you can’t trust a gay general, who can you trust? Well, not people who use pseudonyms from 70’s rock bands.
Example: “Journey,” a.k.a. “Paperserenade,” the girl who asked an abortion question, is a declared John Edwards supporter.
You couldn’t tell from the video that CNN aired, where she’s wearing a plain shirt.
But if you click through on her YouTube profile, you see her latest video in response to the candidates’ answers. And she’s prominently wearing . . . her John Edwards ‘08 t-shirt.
Damn. What about the guy asking about gay Republicans? Nope.
As they say it on the net, CNN got owned.
Stupid, Meet Stupid
How much would you be willing to bet that Larry King is going to die before you will? Most folks would like those odds. So it’s understandable that when Mr. King wanted to sell the right to have a life insurance policy on his life, he had takers. But now, he’s got seller’s remorse.
The broker re-sold the $10 million policy later that year, yielding a $550,000 windfall for the client.
The investors who bought the policies, who remain unidentified, took over payment of the premiums and became the new beneficiaries. The client followed up that transaction by selling a second $5 million policy on his life, earning $850,000. Another unknown investor became the beneficiary.
But then the client had second thoughts. In a lawsuit, he claims he was not fully apprised of the ramifications of what he was doing. Further, he contends that the broker failed to tell him that the new policies, now in an outsider’s hands, would significantly reduce his ability to buy additional life insurance.
So, King’s essentially suing on the basis that he didn’t understand that taking out $15 million in insurance against his own life would impact his ability to get more insurance against his own life. ”Your honor, I was victimized because of my inability to perceive the obvious.”
—
How do you do well in business? An easy way to think about it is the phrase “find a need and fill it.” Unless you make movies.
While the public is staying away in droves from “Rendition,” “Lions for Lambs” and “In the Valley of Elah,” audiences are really avoiding “Redacted,” De Palma’s picture about US soldiers who rape a 14-year-old Iraqi girl, then kill her and her family. The message movie was produced by NBA Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, who insisted on deleting grisly images of Iraqi war casualties from the montage at the film’s end. Cuban offered to sell the film back to De Palma at cost, but the director was too smart to go for that deal.
“Redacted” - which “could be the worst movie I’ve ever seen,” said critic Michael Medved -took in just $25,628 in its opening weekend in 15 theaters, which means roughly 3,000 people saw it in the entire country.
Assuming a national population of 300 million, we can divide the part by the whole and figure out that 0.001 percent of the population paid to see DePalma’s new movie. I think that’s statistically equivalent to the number of people who say the wrong movie title to the ticket clerk.
With all of the free sanctimonious lecturing available from Our Hollywood Betters, why would people pay for it? It’s just like that MP3 thing that has the music industry suing everybody.
Our Business Is Stupid, And Business Is Good
If you own an NFL team, you know that you have 16 regular season games, and that 8 of those will be home games. That means that 8 times a year, you will be hosting a football game and charging people a bunch of money to watch it. You can handle that, right?
Steelers management took almost as much of a beating Tuesday as the playing surface at Heinz Field did the night before when hard rain left it nearly unplayable. Despite a 3-0 win over the Miami Dolphins, critics pounded team officials about the condition of the DVD Grassmaster surface that has had trouble holding up in previous seasons.
The playing surface at Heinz Field was resodded — essentially a new field was laid over the existing one — after the South Florida-Pitt game Saturday, and team officials were pleased with the result.
“I certainly felt bad that the playing conditions were as bad as they were,” Rooney said. “(The field) really looked fantastic (Sunday), so I felt bad that we didn’t have what we thought we were going to have, and that was the unfortunate part.”
The problem occurred, Rooney said, when heavy rain overwhelmed tarps covering the field. Leaky seams caused water to pool in places and, as a result, players on both teams slogged through water and mud.
Resodding cost the Steelers between $100,000 and $200,000, one official said.
The field had taken a beating because four WPIAL championship games were played there Friday, followed by Pitt’s home finale Saturday.
It was the other football games. It was the new sod. It was the half-assed tarps. It was all the rain.
It was your responsibility to host a football game, not a mud-wrestling event.
Politically Stupid
Power is the ability to impose your will on other people. Today’s example:
A widely performed school play has been canceled by Lakota officials after a recent meeting with a local NAACP official. The internationally acclaimed play - Agatha Christie’s “Ten Little Indians” - was to be performed by students at Lakota East High School this weekend.
But Gary Hines, president of the local NAACP branch, recently complained to Lakota officials that the play, based on Christie’s 1939 mystery novel, was inappropriate for a school production.
A serious charge, given the heightened sensitivity to race this country’s had lately. What’s the basis for this claim?
Hines said the book’s original title and cover illustration used for its initial publishing that year in England was a racial slur toward blacks and included a cover illustration of a black person and a hangman’s noose.
“The original title was ‘Ten Little (N - - - - - -),’ and it is important to say that because that was the actual title,” Hines said Monday.
The title of the international bestseller was widely changed after 1939, and school theater productions in America have performed the murder mystery play as either “Ten Little Indians” or “And Then There Were None” for decades since.
My God. Racist marketing in another country 68 years ago?
Hines claims that a lack of racial diversity among Lakota’s students and teachers allowed the play to be chosen despite the history surrounding its original title. But Hines, who operates GPH Consultants - a diversity training company - in West Chester Township, said that despite his strong protest, it was Lakota officials’ idea to cancel the play in response to his complaints.
So, now “diversity” means maintaining a catalog of things that happened and were changed before you were born? Of course it does, what other explanation could there be?
But Joan Powell, president of the Lakota Board of Education, criticized Hines, whose local chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People includes Liberty and West Chester townships, Hamilton and Fairfield. Powell said Hines has a history of making racial accusations against Lakota schools with his personal financial interests sometimes coming into play.
In 2002, Hines accused Lakota schools of widespread, systemic racism and recommended that more than 2,000 Lakota employees be required to enroll in diversity and cultural sensitivity training similar to what was offered by his company. He promised to compile a report months later detailing his accusations against the schools but never produced a document.
Hines, however, has continued to allege racism in the school district.
Most recently in a Nov. 20 e-mail to Powell and other Lakota school board members, he wrote: “Given the history of the district, anything short of involving the NAACP in planning, developing, and executing a systemic approach to diversity is not acceptable and certainly not good enough for the district’s students, faculty, and staff.”
But the play’s canceled, so everybody’s safe now. Thanks to Mr. Hines’ exquisite diversity-based historical memory, any harm was avoided.
Lakota East senior Luke Null, who has rehearsed since September to perform as one of the lead characters, said “pressure from the local NAACP canceled the play.”
“I read the play as part of a class in the ninth grade. There are no racial undertones in it at all, and we weren’t putting on the play under it’s original name from 1939. We were putting on the play under another name,” Null said. He and other theater students are now scrambling to find another play to perform some time early in 2008.
Yup, harm averted.
—
The desire to find and crush racists might be getting out of control. Depends on what you think about a school suspending a student for using the phrase “brown people.”
According to school officials, the boy made a statement about “brown people” to another elementary student with whom he was having a conflict. They maintain it was his second offense using the phrase. But the tape recording indicates this only came out after another parent was allowed to question the boy and elicited from him the statement that he “doesn’t cooperate with brown people.”
After that was reported to the boy’s teacher, he was made to stand in front of his class and publicly confess what he’d said.
The boy maintains that he never said it; that the words were put in his mouth by the parent who questioned him. That parent happens to be the mother of the student with whom he is having a conflict—and she happens to work for Abraham Lincoln as a detention-room officer.
The tape indicates that rather than just spouting off with racial invective, the boy was asked first why he didn’t want to cooperate with brown people by the parent/school official.
In court, this might be called entrapment. Not to mention a conflict of interest.
* * *
Neve said school officials didn’t advise her of the incident until several days after they questioned her son. When Neve objected to the suspension during the conference, [school principal] Voinovich told her that she didn’t have any rights; that parents give up their rights to discipline when they send a child to school, the tape shows.
“If you don’t want that, you can take him out of here,” Voinovich said tersely.
If you spend any time around kids, you’d quickly figure out that they don’t think in terms of race unless they’re taught to do it, but they can’t help but notice the obvious fact that people have different skin coloration. And now, we’re teaching them not to deal with it rationally.
Think Globally, Act Stupidly
Brad Pitt wants to restore the bad parts of New Orleans. Yeah, that didn’t make any sense to me, either, but that’s what he wants to do.
The architects were each asked to design a 1,200-square-foot house for about $150,000, with Make It Right to help with the financing. The houses had to be built five to eight feet off the ground, with a front porch and three bedrooms.
Mr. Mayne of Morphosis opted for a lightweight concrete foundation anchored by two pylons, like a pier, which would buoy the house if floodwaters rise. “It’s a boat,” Mr. Mayne said.
“The population doesn’t want to live on stilts — and it’s expensive,” he added. “These are simple houses for low-income people.”
Mr. Pitt is asking foundations, corporations and individuals to contribute to the project by adopting one house, several houses or a portion of a house through the project Web site. “You can adopt a tankless water heater or a solar panel or a tree or a low-flush toilet,” Mr. Pitt said. “You can give it to someone for Christmas,” he said — instead of another sweater.
Does anyone want to bet how long solar panels and tankless water heaters will stay in the $150,000 floating houses that Pitt wants to build in one of the poorest neighborhoods of one of the poorest states in the US? My wager is that Larry King will still be around to interview Pitt and ask him what the hell he was thinking.
—
Doompimping ain’t easy. Turns out hurricane predictions are about as reliable as college football predictions.
Just before the season started on June 1, the nationally prominent Gray-Klotzbach team at Colorado State University predicted that 17 named storms would grow into nine hurricanes, five of which would be particularly intense, with winds above 110 mph.
A different team at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted 13 to 17 named storms, seven to 10 hurricanes and three to five intense hurricanes.
The actual results for the 2007 season: 14 named storms, five hurricanes, two intense hurricanes.
That turned a season predicted to be extremely active into one that was about average in number of storms and well below average in total intensity.
Even mid-season corrections issued by both teams in August — somewhat akin to changing your prediction about a baseball game during the fifth inning — proved wrong.
Their pre-season predictions in 2005 and 2006 were even worse.
The teams defend their forecasts, saying they are based on the best science available, were closer to the mark in prior years and serve an important public service.
I agree that an important public service is being performed, but I don’t think we mean the same ones. The one I was thinking of was: “Scientists don’t let not knowing what the heck they’re talking about get in the way of making press releases.” The one they were thinking of was: “People shouldn’t be deprived of our valuable opinions so they can plan for dangerous events that might not happen.”
‘’People have the right to know if we think it will be an above normal or below normal season,'’ Bell said.
‘’But we always, always, impress on people that we cannot, on seasonal time scales, predict if a given locality is going to get hit, so they have to be ready,'’ he said.
Predictions of Certain Doom are a lot better when they’re safely in the future. Preferably, a future where you’ve already spent all of your grant money and retired.
—
Let’s say a lot of your arguments based on GLOBAL WARMING involve the words “inconvenient” and “truth.” Wouldn’t it be ironic if there were some true things that inconveniently contradicted your claims?
. . . we have the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change coming up with yet another of its notoriously politicised reports, hyping up the scare by claiming that world surface temperatures have been higher in 11 of the past 12 years (1995-2006) than ever previously recorded.
This carefully ignores the latest US satellite figures showing temperatures having fallen since 1998, declining in 2007 to a 1983 level - not to mention the newly revised figures for US surface temperatures showing that the 1930s had four of the 10 warmest years of the past century, with the hottest year of all being not 1998, as was previously claimed, but 1934.
As the guy who got caught in the act of cheating by his wife: “Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?”
Dangerously Stupid
Nobody wants to be the poor sap who gets taken out by bizarre, random chance. Say, for example, by your preferred pocket for your cell phone.
The man, identified only by his family name Suh, was found dead at his workplace in a quarry Wednesday morning and his mobile phone battery was melted in his shirt pocket, a police official in Cheongwon told The Associated Press.
“We presume that the cell phone battery exploded,” the police official said on condition of anonymity because the investigation was still under way.
Kim Hoon, a doctor who examined the body, agreed.
“He sustained an injury that is similar to a burn in the left chest and his ribs and spine were broken,” Yonhap news agency quoted Kim as saying. “It is presumed that pressure caused by the explosion damaged his heart and lungs, leading to his death.”
If only he’d kept it in this pants pocket, he’d probably be alive and very very unhappy.
UPDATE – the cause of death was false:
“The co-worker confessed to us last (Thursday) night that he had actually hit him by accident and lied about the mobile phone exploding,” said an official with the Cheongju Heungdeok police station, about 100 km (60 miles) southeast of Seoul.
The co-worker confessed to police that he pinned the victim to a rock face while backing up a construction vehicle.
I’m not sure the point has changed that much.